Showing posts with label Alex Maleev. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Maleev. Show all posts

Thursday, December 11, 2014

DAREDEVIL by Bendis & Maleev

  


As Marvel worked to make its way out of bankruptcy it gave a couple of indy creators a chance to play in the world of Daredevil (after Kevin Smith put the book back on the comic map with his 8-issue storyline drawn by Joe Quesada a few years prior).  In 2001, Brian Michael Bendis and Alex Maleev began what would become a defining series for both of them, as well as for the character.  It was a return to the hard-bitten streets of Hell’s Kitchen, as embraced by Frank Miller, Klaus Janson, David Mazzucchelli, et al. in the late 70s and 80s, with a high concept that would turn ol’ hornhead on his ear.



In the seminal Daredevil storyline, “Born Again,” Miller and Mazzucchelli had the Kingpin discover that blind lawyer Matthew Murdock was actually his most frustrating nemesis, Daredevil.  In these seven issues, Wilson Fisk (the Kingpin) used the information to beat down, both emotionally and physically, Matthew Murdock and then sent him off a pier in a taxi cab to his death.  But Murdock survived and eventually came back, as all heroes do, to defeat the Kingpin without sacrificing his moral center.  It’s an incredible story.  And nobody ever picked up that significant bit of continuity again. 

Until Bendis and Maleev came along.


They opened their four-and-a-half year run with the outing, in the tabloids, of Matt Murdock as Daredevil.  From there, they wove interesting stories that brought a number of characters back to the forefront of the Marvel universe like Power Man and Iron Fist, along with newer creations like Jessica Jones.  It was a series of comics that found critical and commercial success and made Bendis and Maleev superstars in the comic industry. 

I recently went back and read through my collected editions of these stories, and for the most part, they are as enjoyable and intriguing as when I initially read them.  But I did not find them to be as good as they were on that first reading. 


Reading these issues all in big chunks, with the collected editions, I think the stories suffer a bit from being read in this fashion, despite the neatly packaged storylines (often 5 issues, sometimes 6) Bendis and Maleev crafted.  But I think they would have read far better month to month as they were initially being published. 

One aspect that hampered my appreciation of the stories was the dialogue tics found in Bendis’s characters.  Certainly, this is a hallmark of Bendis, as a writer, and part of what has garnered him such wide appeal with fans, and I would mark myself as one of those.  It wasn’t so much the dialogue, per se, as much as the need – it feels like a need, a compulsion, on Bendis’s part – for him to infuse this hesitating cadence into much of it.  Sure, one could argue that he was attempting to infuse a sense of tension and fear, on the part of the characters, by doing this.  Except that it appears to infect almost every single character who walks “onstage” in the book.  If it were unique to one individual, it might be less off-putting, but when I started running into this stuttering in storyline after storyline, it soon began to grate on me. 


Another aspect of this run that becomes far more obvious – and, for me, bothersome – when reading these DD stories all in a run is Alex Maleev’s use of repeated images within different panels.  Compounding this, for me, is the fact that Maleev’s artwork is all-digital, and he would often pull in closer onto a detail from a previous panel, which is a good effect, except that the clarity of the linework would deteriorate when he zoomed in on the image for the later panel.  Again, this is a good tool in the comic storyteller’s toolbox, zooming in on a character to show tension or some other emotion, depending on the context of the scene.  But there are many cases where the same image is used multiple times (look at Sammy Silke, Jr. in the first storyline, “Underboss”), which pulls me out of the story because time is supposed to be passing in a scene but this character hasn’t so much as twitched the whole time.  There needs to be some change in the character, otherwise I become far too aware of the fact that I’m “reading something” rather than allowing myself to become immersed in the story.  And this technique is peppered throughout the entire run, to a point that becomes frustrating.  For me. 


Now, these two, admittedly subjective, faults can be overlooked, especially if the stories are good.  And they are pretty damn good.  But with the final storyline – “The Murdock Papers” – Bendis and Maleev take the train right off the tracks.  In this culmination of their run, the Kingpin agrees to give up the evidence he has proving Matt Murdock is Daredevil, if the U.S. government will drop the charges against him, release his assets, and allow him to leave the country and live out the rest of his life.  As an insurance policy, Wilson Fisk gives the story to Ben Urich.  Urich writes the story and it is, obviously, front page news. 

WHAAAAATTTTT????!!!????

Hyperbole aside, this is completely out of character for Urich.  Not only has he already come through the Kingpin’s threats and pressure on his family in the “Born Again” storyline, but I also just re-read Daredevil #164, “Expose,” wherein Ben Urich first discovers Daredevil’s secret identity and takes this information to Murdock, who is in the hospital (still masked, naturally).  They discuss the entire thing, and in the end, Urich burns up his notes, despite the fact that it would have earned him a Pulitzer, because he knows the city, and especially Hell’s Kitchen, needs a hero like Daredevil. 



And yet, at this point, we are to believe that Ben Urich would write a story that as much as states that Murdock is indeed Daredevil – lending far more credence to the rumors that began early in this run, since those stories came from the tabloids, not a bastion of journalism like The Daily Bugle.  This took me right out of the story, even though the underlying plot of the Kingpin was an elegant little plan.  It’s too bad.  It may seem a minor point, but there needs to be internal consistency for any fictional narrative to work, or else the entire thing might collapse under its own weight. 


Did this final crack in the foundation ruin the overall run for me?  Not necessarily.  But I don’t know that I’ll be going back to this series of comics with as much fervor the next time.  If I ever do choose to revisit it. 


Sunday, December 7, 2014

What It Is – week ending 7 December [2014]

With apologies to Dave the Thune.




WRITING:
Every day.  1000 words.  That’s the goal.

With the coming holidays, and other responsibilities, my writing has tapered off a bit this week.  When last we met, I had written roughly 290,000 words for the year, with 231,000 of those being “new” first drafts.  At this point, I have reached 295,325 words with 236,475 “new” words.  I will easily pass my goal of 300,000 words for the year, but life is conspiring against the daily goal. 

All of this writing is paying off.  I got a huge email this week.  A crime anthology I wanted badly to be a part of will be publishing the latest story I submitted to them.  It still feels a bit surreal, and I plan on going into a bit more detail when publication gets closer, so I’ll keep it vague a while longer.  But, for now, I’M IN!



READING:
Finished re-reading the Bendis/Maleev Daredevil run.  It is still enjoyable, but upon this subsequent reading, some cracks in the foundation revealed themselves to me.  Nothing to heinous that it ruined the experience for me, but enough so that it trickled down the list of “favorites” a bit, which also reaffirmed my affection for my favorite DD run of all-time (Born Again, excepted) from Ann Nocenti & John Romita, Jr.  I plan on writing more about both of these runs, so we’ll leave it at that, for now.  Look for the Bendis/Maleeve piece soon, and the Nocenti/JRJr piece far down the line. 

Comic Geek Speak has also been reading and discussing Daredevil this year on their podcast.  The most recent episode dealt with the “[Frank] Miller era.”  This 2 ½ hour discussion really got me excited to go back and re-read my Miller Visionaries trades, and I’ve almost completed the first one of these, which includes all the work written by Roger McKenzie, with a fill-in by David Michelinie.  And they are pretty great, even better than the first time I read these a few years back.  I think at that point the hype surrounding this run of stories was too much to live up to, especially considering hos stellar “Born Again” is, which the CGS guys did not get to with this one.  That book, they will be tackling issue by issue, it sounds like, and that is something I cannot wait to hear.

  
WATCHING:
Watched the second Hobbit film, “The Desolation of Smaug.”  This one, even more than the first, diverges far away from the source text, in order to make it more exciting for the audience.  I suppose that’s smart – different mediums and all – and I know that my middle son said he really enjoyed this one.  But, for me, I am unable to divorce this movie from my childhood experience with the book, and with every new obstacle that need not be there, I shake my head.  *sigh*  Which means my objections should be taken with some sense of skepticism

It feels like a cookie cutter script due to this, rather than consequences growing from choices made by the characters.  We never get a chance to know these characters, because they are always on the run, battling some new obstacle, and doing it with a grace and facility that rings untrue (let the elves have their grace with their lithe bodies, but give the dwarves a different fighting style, please).  And the romance between Tauriel and Kili.  Ugh. 


That said, Smaug was magnificent (see what I did there?)  I enjoyed the scenes with the dragon immensely, even those that trailed far from the path of the book.  I felt a sense of dread for Bilbo (and, come on, Martin Freeman is wonderful as the hobbit, though it feels much like he’s playing “himself” or at least a character very similar to Sherlock’s Watson), and the hubris of Smaug was defined well, though not as expertly as in the book as there were moments where it felt like he should have just roasted the dwarves, quite easily, but that would have been the end of the film with no third film to come.  And I am anxious to see what comes in the final film, for no other reason than where it ends with Smaug.  So, despite its flaws the film did its work.  We’ll see how “The Battle of Five Armies” turns out.

Started the FX show, The Americans.  Only halfway through the pilot, but it’s pretty awesome thus far.  1981.  Russian spies in America.  Their new neighbor is a counterintelligence FBI agent.  Let the fun begin.  And, come on, how did the writer of Speed (Graham Yost) manage to get this and Justified onto the small screen?  Doesn’t matter, because it feels like he’s got two certifiable great shows on his hands.


MISCELLANY:
In the Mouth of Dorkness – the great, and frequently updated blog, from friends Matt & Brad – is now a weeklypodcast, with the able assistance of newest dork, Darren Smith.  The initial ‘cast is almost two hours long, but it didn’t feel like it.  These guys sounded comfortable behind the mics – they should, having been talking all things dork for some years before ever starting the blog – and there was none of those uncomfortable pauses or bits of dead air one might expect from newer podcasters.  They discussed the new Star Wars teaser trailer along with some current films, and then went into their “Fistful of Influences,” their top 5 films that have formed the film fans they all are.  It was fun and insightful and well worth listening to if you enjoy film, especially genre film – though they do cover the gamut with regard to eras, genres, filmmakers, etc. leaving no stone unturned, or some other treacly cliché.  Fun stuff.  Check it out.

And look for my own "Fistful of Influences - movies" in a day or so.


SIGN OFF:
As always, check out my friends – Brad& Matt and Don McMillan for their own weekly recaps on things comic-y and geeky, and we'll see what's what in seven.  

-chris


STAR WARS -- a modern trailer

 This came across my feed, and it's pretty stellar, even if it utilizes some special edition cuts.